<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Kinds Of Insurance You Probably Do Not Need.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/</link> <description>A place to discuss money...for the rest of us.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:21:23 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: The Festival Of Under 30 Finances #15 at Money, Matter, and More Musings</title><link>http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-784</link> <dc:creator>The Festival Of Under 30 Finances #15 at Money, Matter, and More Musings</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:51:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-784</guid> <description>[...] David argues about 10 kinds of insurance with little value (in his opinion) on The Kinds Of Insurance You Probably Do Not Need posted at My Two Dollars [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David argues about 10 kinds of insurance with little value (in his opinion) on The Kinds Of Insurance You Probably Do Not Need posted at My Two Dollars [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: david</title><link>http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-717</link> <dc:creator>david</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:41:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-717</guid> <description>Hi Luke
Yes, disability insurance is pretty important as well.  But for a lot of people, having insurance to cover everything is not a possibility, so I wanted to stick to the ones you definitely 100% had to have; and as I was discussing in some other comments above, if you have the extra money for cancer, disability, etc insurance, then by all means, get it.
Thanks for the comment, Luke, I should have mentioned disability at least!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Luke</p><p>Yes, disability insurance is pretty important as well.  But for a lot of people, having insurance to cover everything is not a possibility, so I wanted to stick to the ones you definitely 100% had to have; and as I was discussing in some other comments above, if you have the extra money for cancer, disability, etc insurance, then by all means, get it.</p><p>Thanks for the comment, Luke, I should have mentioned disability at least!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Luke</title><link>http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-716</link> <dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:24:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-716</guid> <description>David:
I was wondering why you did not list disability insurance among your list of necessities?  Statistically, especially with people in our age group, disability is much more likely than death.  I would have been interested to see how some of the variable riders often found in disability policies stack up in a listing of insurance that is not needed.  Any thoughts along these lines?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David:</p><p>I was wondering why you did not list disability insurance among your list of necessities?  Statistically, especially with people in our age group, disability is much more likely than death.  I would have been interested to see how some of the variable riders often found in disability policies stack up in a listing of insurance that is not needed.  Any thoughts along these lines?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-702</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:20:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-702</guid> <description>That&#039;s ok wdporter, I understand what you are saying. I just do not think that in today&#039;s day and age, people should concentrate on one kind of insurance for one kind of disease, thats all. Everything costs so much money that you need to prioritize what realistically could happen to you versus what could maybe happen to you. If someone has the cash for cancer insurance, then by all means, go for it. But most people are more likely to get hit in their car, die in an accident, have something happen to their house, etc, so I thought the list should focus on things people don&#039;t need unless everything else is covered and they have some extra money to protect themselves.  Thanks for the comments and sorry you lost your dad as well to that terrible disease.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s ok wdporter, I understand what you are saying. I just do not think that in today&#8217;s day and age, people should concentrate on one kind of insurance for one kind of disease, thats all. Everything costs so much money that you need to prioritize what realistically could happen to you versus what could maybe happen to you. If someone has the cash for cancer insurance, then by all means, go for it. But most people are more likely to get hit in their car, die in an accident, have something happen to their house, etc, so I thought the list should focus on things people don&#8217;t need unless everything else is covered and they have some extra money to protect themselves.  Thanks for the comments and sorry you lost your dad as well to that terrible disease.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wdporter</title><link>http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-690</link> <dc:creator>wdporter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:05:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-690</guid> <description>David:
Mine, too...but dying of cancer and surviving after fighting it for a couple of years are two different things.  My dad had great life insurance.
However many people survive--over 60% these days (as opposed to 20+ years ago when my father died of cancer). And medical costs of going through cancer can add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars--and 10 percent of a really big number can be a pretty big number (if costs hit a million--not at all uncommon--that&#039;s $100,000 that&#039;s the patient is still responsible for) and if all that money works, life insurance isn&#039;t there to pay those costs.
Plus, many people want to travel to specialists (Sloan Kettering, Johns Hopkins, MD Anderson, etc.) which means more time off work and travel, lodging, etc.  Health insurance NEVER pays bills other than medical bills, so by itself it&#039;s not enough.
Another way to go is self-insurance (simply having a large enough cushion saved up to take care of the unexpected) and that&#039;s fine as long as nothing happens within about 15 years of when you start preparing for it.
Like I said, not for everyone, but for many it&#039;s a smart move.  I would say if someone WERE to get cancer insurance make sure:
* it covers all types of cancer (including skin)
* it has no lifetime limits on benefits
* it&#039;s guaranteed renewable
* the rates are locked in
* it has riders for other catastrophic occurences (ICU, other illness, etc)
* it can cover a whole family for very little more than an individual.
* there is a very short waiting period before coverage begins (they can range from 30 days to several years).
By the way, sorry to focus on just that one...all of your other nine are right on the money.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David:</p><p>Mine, too&#8230;but dying of cancer and surviving after fighting it for a couple of years are two different things.  My dad had great life insurance.</p><p>However many people survive&#8211;over 60% these days (as opposed to 20+ years ago when my father died of cancer). And medical costs of going through cancer can add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars&#8211;and 10 percent of a really big number can be a pretty big number (if costs hit a million&#8211;not at all uncommon&#8211;that&#8217;s $100,000 that&#8217;s the patient is still responsible for) and if all that money works, life insurance isn&#8217;t there to pay those costs.</p><p>Plus, many people want to travel to specialists (Sloan Kettering, Johns Hopkins, MD Anderson, etc.) which means more time off work and travel, lodging, etc.  Health insurance NEVER pays bills other than medical bills, so by itself it&#8217;s not enough.</p><p>Another way to go is self-insurance (simply having a large enough cushion saved up to take care of the unexpected) and that&#8217;s fine as long as nothing happens within about 15 years of when you start preparing for it.</p><p>Like I said, not for everyone, but for many it&#8217;s a smart move.  I would say if someone WERE to get cancer insurance make sure:</p><p>* it covers all types of cancer (including skin)<br
/> * it has no lifetime limits on benefits<br
/> * it&#8217;s guaranteed renewable<br
/> * the rates are locked in<br
/> * it has riders for other catastrophic occurences (ICU, other illness, etc)<br
/> * it can cover a whole family for very little more than an individual.<br
/> * there is a very short waiting period before coverage begins (they can range from 30 days to several years).</p><p>By the way, sorry to focus on just that one&#8230;all of your other nine are right on the money.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Posts I Enjoyed Last Week - The Sun&#8217;s Financial Diary - Accumulating wealth is like building The Great Wall, one brick at a time</title><link>http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-661</link> <dc:creator>Posts I Enjoyed Last Week - The Sun&#8217;s Financial Diary - Accumulating wealth is like building The Great Wall, one brick at a time</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:50:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-661</guid> <description>[...] Jeremy presents a case of getting your most important asset insured. At the other end, David cites a MSN Money article on some useless insurance policies you may want to abandon. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeremy presents a case of getting your most important asset insured. At the other end, David cites a MSN Money article on some useless insurance policies you may want to abandon. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fivecentnickel.com</title><link>http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-627</link> <dc:creator>fivecentnickel.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:55:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-627</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Weekly Roundup - 01/19/07...&lt;/strong&gt;
Here&#8217;s a quick look at some of the personal finance articles that caught my eye over the past week:
Flexo is thinking about dumping NetFlix. My wife and I actually go &#8217;round and &#8217;round about this same thing. I don&#8217;t think we&amp;#...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Weekly Roundup &#8211; 01/19/07&#8230;</strong></p><p>Here&#8217;s a quick look at some of the personal finance articles that caught my eye over the past week:</p><p>Flexo is thinking about dumping NetFlix. My wife and I actually go &#8217;round and &#8217;round about this same thing. I don&#8217;t think we&amp;#&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-608</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 04:10:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-608</guid> <description>Yes, I do...my own father died at 44 from cancer. And I still think its a poor choice of insurance. His regular health insurance covered 90% of his bills.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I do&#8230;my own father died at 44 from cancer. And I still think its a poor choice of insurance. His regular health insurance covered 90% of his bills.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wdporter</title><link>http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-603</link> <dc:creator>wdporter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:05:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mytwodollars.com/2007/01/18/the-kinds-of-insurance-you-probably-do-not-need/#comment-603</guid> <description>David:
Just a quick question on number 9...
Do you know anyone who has gone through cancer before?
There&#039;s a reason why it&#039;s a focus.  Statistically one of the most bankrupting events in the U.S.  Even with health insurance there is typically a mountain of indirect costs (loss of income, travel, childcare, etc).
Caner has passed up heart disease as the leading killer, and even more important than that: while deaths from Cancer go DOWN, diagnoses and costs of treatment go WAY UP.
Not for everyone, but anyone with a family who has to work to support that family, the coverage is very cheap and makes a lot of sense if you pick the right company.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David:</p><p>Just a quick question on number 9&#8230;</p><p>Do you know anyone who has gone through cancer before?</p><p>There&#8217;s a reason why it&#8217;s a focus.  Statistically one of the most bankrupting events in the U.S.  Even with health insurance there is typically a mountain of indirect costs (loss of income, travel, childcare, etc).</p><p>Caner has passed up heart disease as the leading killer, and even more important than that: while deaths from Cancer go DOWN, diagnoses and costs of treatment go WAY UP.</p><p>Not for everyone, but anyone with a family who has to work to support that family, the coverage is very cheap and makes a lot of sense if you pick the right company.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
