7

GM CEO Steps Down At Request Of White House – I Don’t Buy It.

I cannot believe, at all, that a CEO of a company resigned because the White House asked him to do so. No way, no how. The spinsters in Washington might try to market it this way, but I don’t buy it for a second. If DC was in the business of forcing out CEO’s, why are all the corrupt bankers still redecorating their offices with bailout money? And I don’t believe that Obama all of a sudden wanted to run a car company. (Especially this one) There has got to be something else going on behind the scenes that we don’t know about, as no CEO would resign at the request of the White House. Resign because of the board? Maybe. Shareholders? Maybe. Company about to go belly-up? Maybe. Because he ran the place into the ground? Maybe. But at the request of some guys in D.C.? Nope, not buying it. Here are some snippets from an article in the NY Times talking about what happened yesterday:

“They are bailing out just about anybody that shows up and says they need cash. The public has grown weary of it and instead of throwing a banker to the wolves they have decided to throw Wagoner to the wolves,” Morici said.

GM has lost about $82 billion since 2005 when its problems began to mount in the U.S. market. GM has lost about 95 percent of its value since Wagoner took over as CEO.

GM and Chrysler have run through most of the initial bailout and are at risk of bankruptcy without immediate help. But neither automaker has finished the cost-cutting overhaul dictated by the terms of the auto industry bailout launched by the Bush administration that set a deadline of March 31 for determining whether the companies can be saved.

I know Wagoner is wealthy; he doesn’t need this job to be secure. As the first paragraph I quoted above says, we needed to blame someone – and Wagoner is getting that blame. Too bad it won’t make a difference for him or for GM. My solution? Let these American manufacturers go under and give all that bailout money to the guys making the Tesla electric cars. $50,000 for an electric, beautiful 5 passenger sedan that goes 300 miles on a charge, charges in 45 minutes, and does 0-60 in 5.6 seconds? Or an ugly Chevy Malibu lookalike that costs the same, goes only 40 miles on a charge and then switches to gasoline. It’s a no-brainer which I would buy if I had the cash. Strange how a few guys with some VC money can make viable all-electric cars that most people would be happy driving, while US manufacturers cannot even make their own version of a Prius. Strange times indeed…

Be Sociable, Share!


Like this article? Please consider subscribing to my full feed RSS. Or, if you would prefer, you can subscribe by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox by entering your email address in the box below. Your email will only be used to deliver a daily email and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Comments (7)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. I don’t buy it either. This whole “by request of the White House” is a political stunt.

    I don’t mind him stepping down, I just don’t appreciate it being used as a tool to distract us from the real issues.

    Great post!

  2. Neal Frankle says:

    Thanks for writing this. This is just another illustration of why GM has no reason to exist. They refuse to take responsibility for their lousy management.

    Your solution is awesome. This is a great post. Thanks!

    I suggest that everyone who reads this post tweet about it – I am.

  3. Matt SF says:

    Awesome idea but will never happen. Financiers and old world sentimentality will never allow GM to go under because they built Sherman tanks during WWII.

    I certainly hope Tesla never goes public, otherwise, they’ll be target #1 for a hostile takeover and we’ll never see them again.

  4. david says:

    Oh I know Matt. And I also hope they stay private; I want to own one of these cars someday!

  5. Llama Money says:

    Remember, the Feds did lend GM many billions of dollars. I’d bet that it was more of an order rather than a request. GM has been content to let Wagoner stay on for all these years, failing year after year. It didn’t change until GM started getting money from the government.

  6. There sure are a lot of senators throwing the President under the bus on this one. They all claim it was 100% Obama’s decision.

  7. David says:

    I think that’s a bad move too, especially if you don’t like Obama. Cause if it works, he will look like a hero to the regular old Americans.

    I still don’t like it, but I wouldn’t go down that path either :-)

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.

css.php